Graewe v. O'Brien

538 F. App'x 324
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2013·No. No. 13-6509·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hartmut Graewe, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graewe v. O’Brien, No. 1:12-cv-00103-IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 676273 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 25, 2013). We deny Graewe’s motion for the appointment of counsel and the application to proceed in forma pauperis he filed with regard to the motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graewe v. O'Brien, 538 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2013).

538 F. App'x 324 (Graewe v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graewe v. English
Tenth Circuit, 2019
Hertmut Graewe v. Warden Allenwood FCI
691 F. App'x 61 (Third Circuit, 2017)