Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided April 12, 2007·No. I.C. NO. TA-17722.·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-292 and Tort Claims Rule 301, both parties had fifteen (15) days to file notice of appeal to the Full Commission following their receipt of Deputy Commissioner Rowell's Order filed on May 27, 2005. Since plaintiff failed to file notice of appeal until May 20, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's motion is GRANTED and plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This 6^th day of March 2007.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

*Page 2

CONCURRING:

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

S/_____________ PAMELA T. YOUNG COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-292 and Tort Claims Rule 301, both parties had fifteen (15) days to file notice of appeal to the Full Commission following their receipt of Deputy Commissioner Rowell's Order filed on May 27, 2005. Since plaintiff failed to file notice of appeal until May 20, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's motion is GRANTED and plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This 6^th day of March 2007.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

*Page 2

CONCURRING:

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

S/_____________ PAMELA T. YOUNG COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Pincite

Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction (Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related