Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
This text of Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction (Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2. On or about April 7, 2000, plaintiff was inadvertently struck in the face by a baseball bat, which another inmate released after swinging it. As a result, plaintiff sustained serious facial injuries, including bruising, a laceration to his lip, facial swelling and his number 8 tooth was knocked loose.
3. Plaintiff is complaining that he did not receive adequate medical treatment for this injury and for subsequent ear problems. However, the medical records show that plaintiff received emergency medical treatment immediately after he sustained the injury, and plaintiff acknowledged that he was taken that same day to Albemarle Hospital, where his wounds were sutured and he was given Vicodin, a pain medicine.
4. Plaintiff testified that a month or so later, he began having bleeding from his ears, which he believes is related to his facial injury. The medical records show that around April 21, 2000, plaintiff was seen by medical staff for complaints of blood in his right ear canal. Plaintiff was seen again on May 18, 2000.
5. Dr. Anderson requested a consultation with Dr. Wood, who saw plaintiff on or about June 16, 2000. Dr. Wood assessed plaintiff with right ear canal bleeding from an old scratch. Dr. Wood was of the opinion that plaintiff's ear bleeding was not related to the prior injury. Dr. Wood cleaned the ear and prescribed ear drops as needed. Dr. Wood did not believe a return appointment was necessary.
6. The medical records indicate that plaintiff has received all appropriate and reasonably necessary medical care, including treatment for his ear complaints, with evaluation by Dr. Wood. There is no evidence that the medical staff did not comply with the appropriate standard of medical care in treating plaintiff either immediately after the injury or for his subsequent ear complaints, which may or may not have been related to the injury.
2. Each side shall bear its own costs.
This the 14th day of October 2002.
S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grady v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-v-nc-dept-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2002.