Grady v. Hollywood Paving Co.

California Court of Appeal

Grady v. Hollywood Paving Co.

114 Cal. App. 117

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 13, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 7934

StatusPublished

This text of 114 Cal. App. 117 (Grady v. Hollywood Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grady v. Hollywood Paving Co., 114 Cal. App. 117 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

It appears from the record that the appellants have failed to present or file with the trial court a notice of intention to appeal, or to request the preparation of the transcript within the time allowed by law and that such time has expired. It further appears that the time for the institution of proceedings for the settlement of a bill of exceptions has expired and that no such proceedings have been instituted or commenced.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

It appears from the record that the appellants have failed to present or file with the trial court a notice of intention to appeal, or to request the preparation of the transcript within the time allowed by law and that such time has expired. It further appears that the time for the institution of proceedings for the settlement of a bill of exceptions has expired and that no such proceedings have been instituted or commenced.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 Cal. App. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-v-hollywood-paving-co-calctapp-1931.