Grady v. Grady

130 So. 35, 98 Fla. 899
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 35 (Grady v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grady v. Grady, 130 So. 35, 98 Fla. 899 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Ellis are of opinion that the order of the circuit court in this cause should be reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings; Mr. Justicé Strum, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the order should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 So. 35, 98 Fla. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-v-grady-fla-1929.