Grady v. Barden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Grady v. Barden

53 Ga. 553

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 Ga. 553 (Grady v. Barden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grady v. Barden, 53 Ga. 553 (Ga. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

The fact that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the transcript of the record and the bill of exceptions, does not cure the absence of service. (R.)

Service. Officers. Practice in the Supreme Court. January Term, 1875.

When this case was called a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error because no service appeared on the bill of exceptions. It was replied that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the record and bill of exceptions, and therefore had full notice of all the proceedings in the case. The writ of error was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The fact that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the transcript of the record and the bill of exceptions, does not cure the absence of service. (R.)

Service. Officers. Practice in the Supreme Court. January Term, 1875.

When this case was called a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error because no service appeared on the bill of exceptions. It was replied that the defendant in error was the clerk of the superior court who certified the record and bill of exceptions, and therefore had full notice of all the proceedings in the case. The writ of error was dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Ga. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-v-barden-ga-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack