Grady Renard Williams, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Evans, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia
DecidedOctober 27, 2025
Docket7:24-cv-00102
StatusUnknown

This text of Grady Renard Williams, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Evans, et al. (Grady Renard Williams, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Evans, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grady Renard Williams, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Evans, et al., (M.D. Ga. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR., : : Plaintiff, : v. : : CASE NO.: 7:24-CV-00102 (WLS) Correctional Officer EVANS, et al., : : Defendants. : ___________________________________ : ORDER Before the Court is Recommendation (Doc. 33) from United States Magistrate Judge Alfreda L. Sheppard entered on August 26, 2025. Therein, Judge Sheppard recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Grady Renard Williams, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff”) second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 22). The Recommendation and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provided Plaintiff with fourteen days to object to Judge Sheppard’s findings and recommendations. (Doc. 33 at 3). A review of the Docket in this case shows that the Clerk mailed a copy of the Recommendation to Plaintiff on August 26, 2025. More than sixty (60) have passed since that date. The deadline for objections has elapsed with neither party having filed an objection. In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error and manifest injustice. See United States v. Aponte, 461 F. App’x 828, 830 n.2 (11th Cir. 2012). Upon full review and consideration of the Record, the Court finds neither plain error nor manifest injustice in Judge Sheppard’s Recommendation. The Recommendation (Doc. 33) is thus ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and made the Order of this Court, for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. As a result, Plaintiff’s second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 22) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 27th day of October 2025. /s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Marcos Aponte
461 F. App'x 828 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Grady Renard Williams, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Evans, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-renard-williams-jr-v-correctional-officer-evans-et-al-gamd-2025.