Grady M. Kittrell v. Jane K. Kittrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grady M. Kittrell v. Jane K. Kittrell

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 22, 2014

Docket14-1918

StatusPublished

This text of Grady M. Kittrell v. Jane K. Kittrell (Grady M. Kittrell v. Jane K. Kittrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grady M. Kittrell v. Jane K. Kittrell, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GRADY M. KITTRELL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-1918

JANE K. KITTRELL,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed September 19, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Grady M. Kittrell, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State,

6 So. 3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that trial judge was not required to

rule on motion to disqualify which was never served on judge as required by Florida

Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(c)); Thomas v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 74 So.

3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (stating that absent a showing that an express and distinct

demand for performance was made, mandamus will not lie to compel a court to rule on

a pleading in a civil matter).

WOLF, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI