Grady Alton Hill, Rayburn B. Hill and Johnnie Daniel Hill v. United States
This text of 412 F.2d 848 (Grady Alton Hill, Rayburn B. Hill and Johnnie Daniel Hill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully considered the contentions made here by appellants and find them without merit. Specifically, we find ample evidence of proof of the conspiracy to violate the federal alcohol tax statutes; that no prejudicial error resulted from the statement by one witness that a co-conspirator had pleaded guilty in light of the cautionary instruction given by the trial court, Roe v. United States (5 Cir., 1963) 316 F.2d 617; and finally, that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to dismiss the indictment for want of a speedier trial. United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116, 86 S.Ct. 773, 15 L.Ed.2d 627.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 F.2d 848, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grady-alton-hill-rayburn-b-hill-and-johnnie-daniel-hill-v-united-states-ca5-1969.