Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co.

699 So. 2d 155, 1997 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 460, 1997 WL 309377
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJune 6, 1997
Docket2940888
StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 155 (Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete Equipment Co., 699 So. 2d 155, 1997 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 460, 1997 WL 309377 (Ala. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

After Remand from Supreme Court

SAM A. BEATTY, Retired Justice.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of April 18, 1997, Ex parte Gradford, 699 So.2d 149 (Ala.1997), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by SAM A. BEATTY, Retired Justice,- Supreme Court of Alabama, while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Ala.Code 1975.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Gradford
699 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 155, 1997 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 460, 1997 WL 309377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gradford-v-nicholas-concrete-equipment-co-alacivapp-1997.