Graczyk v. White
112 A.D.2d 775, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56015
Opinions
Order modified, in the exercise of discretion, to provide that the granting of defendants’ motion be conditioned upon defendants paying to plaintiff $500 in view of the costs and inconvenience incident to the delay and that plaintiff be allowed a continuance for additional preparation (CPLR 3025 [b]), and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graczyk v. White, 112 A.D.2d 775, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
112 A.D.2d 775 (Graczyk v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brodvin v. Hertz Corp.
487 F. Supp. 1336 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Spier v. Barker
323 N.E.2d 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New York
459 N.E.2d 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Davis v. Davis
49 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Barnes v. County of Nassau
108 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)