Graczyk v. White

112 A.D.2d 775, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56015

This text of 112 A.D.2d 775 (Graczyk v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graczyk v. White, 112 A.D.2d 775, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

Order modified, in the exercise of discretion, to provide that the granting of defendants’ motion be conditioned upon defendants paying to plaintiff $500 in view of the costs and inconvenience incident to the delay and that plaintiff be allowed a continuance for additional preparation (CPLR 3025 [b]), and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brodvin v. Hertz Corp.
487 F. Supp. 1336 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Spier v. Barker
323 N.E.2d 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New York
459 N.E.2d 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Davis v. Davis
49 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Barnes v. County of Nassau
108 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 775, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graczyk-v-white-nyappdiv-1985.