Gracier v. Weir
45 Cal. 53
Opinion
Upon the motion of the appellant to be admitted to defend the action, the respondent was permitted to file affidavits contradicting the allegation of merits contained in the moving papers. This is not proper practice. The order is reversed without costs, and the Court below directed to set aside the default, and permit the appellant to file an answer upon such terms as may be proper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gracier v. Weir, 45 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1872).
45 Cal. 53 (Gracier v. Weir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Sutton
122 P.2d 975 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Sheehan v. Pioneer Lucky Strike Gold Mining Co.
54 P.2d 72 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Brasher v. White
200 P. 657 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
McDonald v. McDonald
159 P. 426 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. Lacy
151 S.W. 1170 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Centreville National Bank of Warwick v. Inman
33 A. 755 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1912)
McLaughlin v. Nettleton
1909 OK 313 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
State v. Dickinson
88 N.W. 621 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Douglass v. Todd
31 P. 623 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Griswold Linseed Oil Co. v. Lee
47 N.W. 955 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)