Gracier v. Weir
45 Cal. 53
This text of 45 Cal. 53 (Gracier v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gracier v. Weir, 45 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1872).
Opinion
Upon the motion of the appellant to be admitted to defend the action, the respondent was permitted to file affidavits contradicting the allegation of merits contained in the moving papers. This is not proper practice. The order is reversed without costs, and the Court below directed to set aside the default, and permit the appellant to file an answer upon such terms as may be proper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thompson v. Sutton
122 P.2d 975 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Sheehan v. Pioneer Lucky Strike Gold Mining Co.
54 P.2d 72 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Brasher v. White
200 P. 657 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
McDonald v. McDonald
159 P. 426 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. Lacy
151 S.W. 1170 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Centreville National Bank of Warwick v. Inman
33 A. 755 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1912)
McLaughlin v. Nettleton
1909 OK 313 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
State v. Dickinson
88 N.W. 621 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Douglass v. Todd
31 P. 623 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Griswold Linseed Oil Co. v. Lee
47 N.W. 955 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gracier-v-weir-cal-1872.