Graceffo v. Graceffo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graceffo v. Graceffo

67 A.D.2d 998, 413 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10796

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 998 (Graceffo v. Graceffo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graceffo v. Graceffo, 67 A.D.2d 998, 413 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for divorce, wherein defendant counterclaimed for divorce, (1) defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1977, as awarded alimony to plaintiff, and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from stated portions of the same order. Cross appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect. On defendant’s appeal, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The joint inquest upon which the dual divorce was granted, was based upon a stipulation of the parties that plaintiff was to receive $30 per week alimony. We reject defendant’s contention that the stipulation was limited until determination of the issue of custody. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for divorce, wherein defendant counterclaimed for divorce, (1) defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1977, as awarded alimony to plaintiff, and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from stated portions of the same order. Cross appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect. On defendant’s appeal, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The joint inquest upon which the dual divorce was granted, was based upon a stipulation of the parties that plaintiff was to receive $30 per week alimony. We reject defendant’s contention that the stipulation was limited until determination of the issue of custody. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 998, 413 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graceffo-v-graceffo-nyappdiv-1979.