Grace v. Sparks

668 F. App'x 499
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2536
StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 499 (Grace v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grace v. Sparks, 668 F. App'x 499 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Tina and Larry Grace appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Specifically, the Graces challenge the district court’s dismissal of the claims against appellees C. Michael Sparks and Michael Thornsbury. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grace v. Sparks, No. 2:15-cv-01505, 2016 WL 4005902 (S.D. W. Va. Nov. 19, 2015 & July 25, 2016); see Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356-57, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978); Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-31, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imbler v. Pachtman
424 U.S. 409 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Stump v. Sparkman
435 U.S. 349 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-v-sparks-ca4-2016.