Grace v. Iula

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Grace v. Iula

772 A.2d 899, 167 N.J. 572, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 721

DecidedJanuary 30, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 772 A.2d 899 (Grace v. Iula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grace v. Iula, 772 A.2d 899, 167 N.J. 572, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 721 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for certification is granted, the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for the entry of an order permitting the amendment of plaintiff’s answers to interrogatories to include Drs. Sklaroff and Wolf, the filing of their 1997 reports, the prompt scheduling of depositions of the doctors by defendants, and the setting of a peremptory trial date as soon as may be practicable after the completion of depositions.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for certification is granted, the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for the entry of an order permitting the amendment of plaintiff’s answers to interrogatories to include Drs. Sklaroff and Wolf, the filing of their 1997 reports, the prompt scheduling of depositions of the doctors by defendants, and the setting of a peremptory trial date as soon as may be practicable after the completion of depositions.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

772 A.2d 899, 167 N.J. 572, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-v-iula-nj-2001.