Grace v. Harris

Eighth Circuit

Grace v. Harris

334 F. App'x 791

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2009·No. No. 08-2478·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Grace, Sr., appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Grace’s motion for appointment of counsel and appellees’ motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Grace, Sr., appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Grace’s motion for appointment of counsel and appellees’ motion to dismiss.

Grace v. Harris, 334 F. App'x 791 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 791 (Grace v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related