Grace v. Harris

Eighth Circuit

Grace v. Harris

334 F. App'x 791

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2009

DocketNo. 08-2478

StatusPublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 791 (Grace v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grace v. Harris, 334 F. App'x 791 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Grace, Sr., appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Grace’s motion for appointment of counsel and appellees’ motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Grace, Sr., appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Grace’s motion for appointment of counsel and appellees’ motion to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 F. App'x 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-v-harris-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack