Grace v. Denison

114 Mass. 16
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Wells, J.

The memorandum of agreement indicates that a part of the purchase money was agreed to be secured by mortgage of the premises to be conveyed. But it does not disclose nor furnish any means for the court to ascertain what part or amount is to remain upon mortgage, and what paid in cash upon delivery of the deed. The statute of frauds does not permit such % contract to be enforced without a memorandum of it in writing, signed by the party to be charged. The court cannot therefore go outside of this writing to ascertain what the real agreement of the parties was in this particular. The writing being incomplete in one of its essential terms, and the court having no means to which it can lawfully resort to supply the defect, specific performance must fail. Fry on Specific Performance, §§ 221, 222 & note 7. Browne on St. Frauds, §§ 376, 381. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Babcock, 3 Cush. 228, 232.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grace v. Denison, 114 Mass. 16 (Mass. 1873).

114 Mass. 16 (Grace v. Denison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. B. C. Auto Parts, Inc. v. Moran
268 N.E.2d 844 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Rosenberg v. Deitrick
37 F. Supp. 700 (D. Massachusetts, 1940)
Cohen v. Stow
2 Mass. App. Div. 132 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1937)
Conos v. Sullivan
145 N.E. 529 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Forman v. Gadouas
142 N.E. 87 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Simpson v. Green
231 S.W. 375 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1921)
McClung Drug Co. v. City Realty & Investment Co.
108 A. 767 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1919)
Jamestown Portland Cement Corp. v. Bowles
117 N.E. 41 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Vierra v. Ropert
10 Haw. 294 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1896)
Hayes v. Jackson
34 N.E. 683 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Fogg v. Price
14 N.E. 741 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Wells v. Day
124 Mass. 38 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)
Lynes v. Hayden
119 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)