Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

362 U.S. 144, 80 S. Ct. 681, 4 L. Ed. 2d 617, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1522
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1960·No. 652·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles, 362 U.S. 144, 80 S. Ct. 681, 4 L. Ed. 2d 617, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1522 (1960).

362 U.S. 144 (Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Ala.
440 So. 2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)