Home/Supreme Court/Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles

362 U.S. 144, 80 S. Ct. 681, 4 L. Ed. 2d 617, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1522
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 7, 1960
Docket652
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 U.S. 144 (Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles, 362 U.S. 144, 80 S. Ct. 681, 4 L. Ed. 2d 617, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1522 (1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Ala.
440 So. 2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
362 U.S. 144, 80 S. Ct. 681, 4 L. Ed. 2d 617, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-corso-v-security-first-national-bank-of-los-angeles-scotus-1960.