Grabill v. Corizon, Inc.
This text of 565 F. App'x 256 (Grabill v. Corizon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stanley M. Grabill, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Corizon, Incorporated’s motion to dismiss and dismissing the complaint for failing to sufficiently comply with Md.Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-2A-04(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum, and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. Grabill v. Corizon, Inc., No. 1:13-CV-00039-JKB (D.Md. Aug. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grabill-v-corizon-inc-ca4-2014.