G.R. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

332 F. App'x 902
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2009·No. No. 08-2317·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

G.R. seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for [903] the reasons stated by the Board. G.R. v. APM Terminals, Inc., No. 08-0435 (B.R.B. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G.R. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 332 F. App'x 902 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 902 (G.R. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-950
33 U.S.C. § 901-950
§ 901
33 U.S.C. § 901