G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999)

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 1999
DocketNo. 97-L-317
StatusUnpublished

This text of G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999) (G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999), (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Judgment affirmed.

Nader, J., concurs in judgment only with Concurring Opinion. See Opinions and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (NADER) (O'NEILL)

STATUTES/CONSTITUTION:

R.C. 5525.16(C) requires a party suing a surety to recover money owed by the insured to furnish the surety with a "statement of the amount due" under the strict time limits articulated in the statute. The failure to furnish the statement within the time limits terminates the plaintiff's cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gr-osterland-co-v-t-a-bridge-cons-unpublished-decision-6-25-1999-ohioctapp-1999.