Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999)

G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 1999·No. No. 97-L-317·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Judgment affirmed.

Nader, J., concurs in judgment only with Concurring Opinion. See Opinions and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (NADER) (O'NEILL)

STATUTES/CONSTITUTION:

R.C. 5525.16(C) requires a party suing a surety to recover money owed by the insured to furnish the surety with a "statement of the amount due" under the strict time limits articulated in the statute. The failure to furnish the statement within the time limits terminates the plaintiff's cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999), (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).

G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999) (G.R. Osterland Co. v. T. a Bridge Cons., Unpublished Decision (6-25-1999)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.