GQ Enterprises Corporation v. Inayatali Rajani and the Rajani Group

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 2013·No. 05-12-01353-CV·Published

Opinion

Order issued January , 2013

In The Qinirt nf Tptzt13 fift1! Diitrict tif ixa5 at Jat1ai No. 05-12-01353-CV

GQ ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

1NAYATALI RAJANI ANt) TilE RAJANI GROUP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial 1)istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-I 1-05188

ORDER

Based on the Courfs opinion of this date, appellees’ November 26. 2012 and December 19.

201 2 motions to extend time to file response to appellant’s motion for extension of time to file

notice of appeal” are DENIED as moot.

LANG JUSTI C

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order issued January , 2013

In The Qinirt nf Tptzt13 fift1! Diitrict tif ixa5 at Jat1ai No. 05-12-01353-CV

GQ ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

1NAYATALI RAJANI ANt) TilE RAJANI GROUP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial 1)istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-I 1-05188

ORDER

Based on the Courfs opinion of this date, appellees’ November 26. 2012 and December 19.

201 2 motions to extend time to file response to appellant’s motion for extension of time to file

notice of appeal” are DENIED as moot.

LANG JUSTI C

GQ Enterprises Corporation v. Inayatali Rajani and the Rajani Group, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

GQ Enterprises Corporation v. Inayatali Rajani and the Rajani Group (GQ Enterprises Corporation v. Inayatali Rajani and the Rajani Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.