GP Hospitality Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company

N.D. Texas

GP Hospitality Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Texas·Decided September 17, 2025·No. 5:25-cv-00133·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION GP HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, No. 5:25-CV-133-H STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court grant the parties’ motions to dismiss this case without prejudice. Dkt. Nos. 7; 18; 19. Judge Reno recommends dismissing this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and because both parties have now moved for dismissal. Dkt. No. 19 at 2; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). No objections were filed, and the plaintiff has taken no action in this case since August 26, 2025. See Dkt. No. 18. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The parties’ motions to dismiss this case without prejudice (Dkt. Nos. 7; 18) are granted. So ordered on September if. , 2025.

JAM fs WESLEY HENDRIX UMTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION GP HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, No. 5:25-CV-133-H STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court grant the parties’ motions to dismiss this case without prejudice. Dkt. Nos. 7; 18; 19. Judge Reno recommends dismissing this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and because both parties have now moved for dismissal. Dkt. No. 19 at 2; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). No objections were filed, and the plaintiff has taken no action in this case since August 26, 2025. See Dkt. No. 18. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The parties’ motions to dismiss this case without prejudice (Dkt. Nos. 7; 18) are granted. So ordered on September if. , 2025.

JAM fs WESLEY HENDRIX UMTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

GP Hospitality Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, (N.D. Tex. 2025).

Pincite

GP Hospitality Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company (GP Hospitality Group, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.