Goyco v. Bencivengo

14 Misc. 2d 72, 178 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2673
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Motion for preference pursuant to rule 151 of the Buies of Civil Practice is denied since there is no showing of indigence or imminence of death of the injured plaintiffs. The several grounds for the preference set forth by the plaintiffs, namely, noninsurance, disclaimer of liability and possible dissipation of assets, charged against the various defendants, are both unsubstantiated and insufficient. There is no factual evidence of the dissipation of assets and the allega[73]*73tions concerning same seem to be merely conchisory. In any case, the remedy against wrongful dissipation of funds by a defendant is not a motion for preference of trial pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The absence or disclaimer of liability insurance is also no basis for a preference under the rule.

Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goyco v. Bencivengo, 14 Misc. 2d 72, 178 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2673 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

14 Misc. 2d 72 (Goyco v. Bencivengo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Abolafia
18 A.D.2d 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)