Gower v. HARKEMA
711 N.W.2d 37
This text of 711 N.W.2d 37 (Gower v. HARKEMA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gower v. HARKEMA, 711 N.W.2d 37 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Michelle GOWER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Edwin Gower, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James HARKEMA, M.D., Christopher Seip, M.D., Benjamin B. Mosher, M.D., Christopher Abood, M.D., Tonia Reincke, PA-C, Sparrow Hospital, Greg A. Howells, M.D., Keith Blum, D.O., Christina Maser Ohm, M.D., Kevin Krause, M.D., Gregory Nowinski, M.D., Julie Stein, M.D., and William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Defendants-Appellees, and
George Arthur Williams, M.D., and Associated Retinal Consultants, P.C., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
AMENDMENT TO ORDER
On order of the Court, the order of November 2, 2005 is amended to correct a clerical error by correcting the text thereof to read as follows:
*38 "On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 and February 1, 2005 orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gower-v-harkema-mich-2006.