Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Gower v. Di Cristina

Gower v. Di Cristina

119 S.E. 668, 31 Ga. App. 40, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 714
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 3, 1923·No. 14695·Published

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

Tlie judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. H. A. Etheridge, for plaintiff, cited:

104 Ga. 203; 139 Ga. 283.

Roy L. Mitchell, Underwood, Pomeroy & Haas, for defendant, cited:

146 Ga. 187; 152 Ga. 835; Civil Code (1910), § 3587; 129 Ga. 486, 489; 139 Ga. 296; 15 Ga. App. 210; 16 Id. 253; 19 Id. 704; 23 Id. 353; 26 Id. 196; 27 Id. 87; 5 Id. 340; 9 Id. 849; 23 Id. 578; 104 Ga. 203 (distinguished); 139 Ga. 283 (distinguished).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gower v. Di Cristina, 119 S.E. 668, 31 Ga. App. 40, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

119 S.E. 668 (Gower v. Di Cristina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Odell v. Dozier
30 S.E. 813 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Payne v. Ponder
77 S.E. 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Gray v. Lynn
77 S.E. 156 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Jones v. State
91 S.E. 67 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Gresham v. Lee
111 S.E. 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)