Gowens ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Key Ford, Inc.

352 So. 2d 961
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1977·No. No. FF-308·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED. While we specifically do not rule on the ultimate resolution of this case, we hold that the lower court erred in directing a verdict against Appellant. The testimony he presented and the reasonable inferences therefrom were sufficient to send the case to the jury. It is the jury’s duty to weigh and evaluate all of the testimony in cases of this type. Cromarty v. Ford Motor Co., 341 So.2d 507 (Fla.1977).

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gowens ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Key Ford, Inc., 352 So. 2d 961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 961 (Gowens ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Key Ford, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cromarty v. Ford Motor Co.
341 So. 2d 507 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)