Gowen v. Glaser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gowen v. Glaser

10 A. 417, 2 Sadler 250

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 12, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 A. 417 (Gowen v. Glaser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gowen v. Glaser, 10 A. 417, 2 Sadler 250 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

No point was made in thé trial as to any contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiffs below. The question was then not even mooted. It was not error to omit to rule on a question that neither party presented or suggested. Every question of negligence that was raised was correctly presented to the jury.

[258]*258We see no error in the admission of evidence, nor in answer» to the points.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

No point was made in thé trial as to any contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiffs below. The question was then not even mooted. It was not error to omit to rule on a question that neither party presented or suggested. Every question of negligence that was raised was correctly presented to the jury.

[258]*258We see no error in the admission of evidence, nor in answer» to the points.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A. 417, 2 Sadler 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gowen-v-glaser-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack