Gowan v. McAdoo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gowan v. McAdoo

173 N.W. 443, 143 Minn. 481, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 540

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 11, 1919

DocketNo. 21,280

StatusPublished

This text of 173 N.W. 443 (Gowan v. McAdoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gowan v. McAdoo, 173 N.W. 443, 143 Minn. 481, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 540 (Mich. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying a motion for a new trial and by plaintiff from an order dismissing the action as to the Northern Pacific Railway Company and substituting William G. McAdoo, as Director General of Railroads, as defendant.

The disposition of both appeals in this action is controlled by the decision in Gowan v. McAdoo, supra, page 227, 173 N. W. 440.

The order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial is affirmed. The order substituting the Director General of Railroads for the original defendant is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying a motion for a new trial and by plaintiff from an order dismissing the action as to the Northern Pacific Railway Company and substituting William G. McAdoo, as Director General of Railroads, as defendant.

The disposition of both appeals in this action is controlled by the decision in Gowan v. McAdoo, supra, page 227, 173 N. W. 440.

The order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial is affirmed. The order substituting the Director General of Railroads for the original defendant is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 N.W. 443, 143 Minn. 481, 1919 Minn. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gowan-v-mcadoo-minn-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack