Govitt v. State
8 S.W. 478, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 419, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74
Opinion
Both the complaint and the information are fatally defective in that they fail to allege the want of consent of each of the owners of the fence to the pulling down and injuring thereof by the defendant. (Taylor v. The State, 23 Texas Ct. App., 639; Brumley v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 609.)
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Govitt v. State, 8 S.W. 478, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 419, 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tex. Ct. App. 1888).
8 S.W. 478 (Govitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pate v. State
113 S.W. 757 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)