Governor's Approval of Legislation

68 Pa. D. & C.2d 43
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedOctober 2, 1974
DocketOfficial Opinion no. 74-50
StatusPublished

This text of 68 Pa. D. & C.2d 43 (Governor's Approval of Legislation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Governor's Approval of Legislation, 68 Pa. D. & C.2d 43 (Pa. 1974).

Opinion

PACKEL, Attorney General,

You have asked for our opinion regarding the computation of time within which the Governor must take action on a bill before it becomes law without his signature. Article IV, Sec. 15, of the Pennsylvania Constitution reads, in part:

“If any bill shall not be returned by the Governor within ten days after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law in like manner as if he had signed it.”

It is our opinion that the proper computation of the ten-day period provided for the Governor to act on bills presented to him is to exclude the day of presentation and to include the tenth calendar day thereafter, regardless of whether the tenth day falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. The Governor may sign or return a bill on the day of presentation. If the Governor takes no action on a bill by the end of the tenth day, the bill becomes law on the tenth day.1

[45]*45Three bills have become law without the Governor’s signature in 1974, as they were neither signed nor returned to their originating House within ten days of presentation to the Governor, The bills and their dates of enactment are:

1. House Bill 1911, Printer’s No. 2772; Act of May 2, 1974, P. L. 298 (No. 76), 71 PS §152.

2. House Bill 1912, Printer’s No. 2773; Act of May 2, 1974, P. L. 300 (No. 77), 71 PS §741.3 (note).

3. House Bill 1661, Printer’s No. 2967; Act of June 14, 1974, P. L. 367 (No. 103), 71 PS §§398 et seq.

The first major issue is whether the day of presentation of bills to the Governor is included in computing the ten-day period in which the Governor has to act. “The period of time referred to in any law is computed so as to exclude the first and include the last day of any such period”: Commonwealth v. Kuhn, 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 649, 654 (1963); Gibson v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co., 311 Pa. 312 (1933); Cromelion v. Brink, 29 Pa. 522 (1858). See also section 1908 of The Statutory Construction Act of 1972 (No. 290), 1 Pa. C. S. §1908. More specifically: “In computing the period of time within which the chief executive of a state may approve an act of the legislature presented to him, or within which the act, if not returned, will become law, the rule is that the day of presentation is to be excluded and the last day included”: Annot., 54 A. L. R. 339, 340, citing Croissant v. De Soto Improv. Co. 87 Fla. 530, 101 So. 37 (1924); State ex rel. Putnam v. Holm, 172 Minn. 162, 215 N. W. 200 (1927). Therefore, in the computation of the ten days within [46]*46which the Governor may act, the day of presentation is not counted as the first day.2

Secondly, the question is whether in counting the days in which the Governor may act, all calendar days are counted. “Unless expressly excluded . .. intervening Sundays, Saturdays, and legal holidays, that is, such days which fall on neither the first nor last day, are to be included in computing a period of time, even though the period is shorter than a week”: 37 P. L. Encyc. 110, §25 (1961), citing Hood Unemployment Compensation Case, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 88; Alexander Unemployment Compensation Case, 398 Pa. 551 (I960); Edmundson v. Wragg, 104 Pa. 500 (1884); Balitski v. Springfield Coal Co., 46 D. & C. 273 (1943).

As a consequence, the proper computation of days for action on the three above-mentioned bills is made as follows:

1. House Bills 1911 and 1912 were presented to the Governor on Monday, April 22, 1974; the first day was Tuesday, April 23rd; the tenth and last day for action was Thursday, May 2, 1974.

2. House Bill 1661 was presented to the Governor on Tuesday, June 4, 1974; the first day was Wednesday, June 5th; the tenth and last day for action was Friday, June 14, 1974.

You will note that the tenth day within which [47]*47some action ón House Bill 1661 had to take place was Friday, June 14, 1974, a legal holiday (Flag Day); Act of September 21, 1965, P. L. 534 (No. 274) as amended 44 PS §11. This fact presents a third issue as to whether, if the tenth and last day for action falls on Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, such day shall be included in the computation. It is our opinion that Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays do not toll the computation of days if the tenth and last day for action falls on one of these days. The Statutory Construction Act of 1972, at 1 Pa. C. S. §1908, is not applicable in this situation because the mandate of the Constitution as to computation of days is clear and unambiguous on its face. Provisions found elsewhere in the Pennsylvania Constitution are effective regardless of whether a specified day falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. For example article II, sec. 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, reads, in part:

“The General Assembly ... shall meet at twelve o’clock noon on the first Tuesday of January of each year.”

Although the first Tuesday of January 1974, was New Year’s Day and a legal holiday, Act of September 21, 1965, supra, the General Assembly met on that day in compliance with the Constitution.

The vast majority of State constitutions and the Federal Constitution read, “If any bill shall not be returned by the [chief executive] within [a certain number of] days (Sundays, excepted)....” (Emphasis supplied).

Only the Constitution of Colorado is identical to the sentence at issue in article IV, sec. 15, of the Pennsylvania Constitution. A Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Opinion (Signing of Bills by the Governor, 24 Dist. R. 352 (1915)), holds that if the last day for action falls on a Sunday, the Governor has Monday to [48]*48return or sign the bill. It is our opinion that this holding was unwarranted and, to the extent that it is inconsistent with this opinion, is overruled. The 1915 opinion offers only one citation in support of its proposition that Sundays are excepted from computation as to the last day for action on a bill: Computation of time, 9 Colo. 632, 21 Pac. 475 (1886). Other citations given are to cases in States with constitutional provisions dissimilar to our own. The Colorado decision does not cite a single case to justify its holding that because the last day for action on a bill fell on a Sunday, “it follows from reason and principle that the return-day was continued by operation of law until Monday”: Id. Moreover, the Colorado court’s finding is based on a premise which does not apply in Pennsylvania. The Colorado opinion notes that since the General Assembly was not in session on Sunday, the Governor had no opportunity to communicate with that body. This reasoning is not applicable in this Commonwealth for three reasons. First, nothing in the Pennsylvania Constitution prohibits the General Assembly from meeting, or the Governor from acting, on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Second, the Governor may sign or veto a bill on a Sunday or any other day. Third, the General Assembly need not be meeting in Harrisburg for the Governor to return a bill to its originating House.3

Finally, there is the question of the date of enactment of a bill if the Governor does not take any action on the bill within the ten-day period. The Governor [49]*49has the power to choose not to sign a bill and allow it to become “a law in like manner as if he had signed it”: Pa. Constitution, art. IV, sec. 15. If he chooses to sign, he must do so on or before the tenth day, as discussed above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Kuhn
190 A.2d 337 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Grant Estate
105 A.2d 80 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
State Ex Rel. Putnam v. Holm
215 N.W. 200 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Gibson v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.
166 A. 842 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Duddy v. Conshohocken Printing Co.
60 A.2d 394 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Cooper v. Nolan
19 S.W.2d 274 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1929)
Croissant v. DeSoto Improvement Co.
101 So. 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Cromelien v. Brink
29 Pa. 522 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1858)
Edmundson v. Wragg
104 Pa. 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1883)
Steere's Dairy, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
159 A.2d 689 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Hood Unemployment Compensation Case
163 A.2d 896 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/governors-approval-of-legislation-padeptjust-1974.