Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman

1 Va. 156, 1 Gratt. 157

Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided September 15, 1844·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court

being of opinion, that upon the principle of the cases of Tolson v. Elwes, 1 Leigh 436, Meze v. Howver, Id. 442, and especially of the case of Burnett v. Harwell, 3 Leigh 89, the action was improperly [158] brought at the relation of Isaac and Daniel Leighton; ^ tkat-t ghoui¿ have been at the relation of Denison Rose, the plaintiff in the execution in the declaration mentioned, reversed the judgment of the court below, sustaine<^ the demurrer to the declaration, and gave judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court

being of opinion, that upon the principle of the cases of Tolson v. Elwes, 1 Leigh 436, Meze v. Howver, Id. 442, and especially of the case of Burnett v. Harwell, 3 Leigh 89, the action was improperly [158] brought at the relation of Isaac and Daniel Leighton; ^ tkat-t ghoui¿ have been at the relation of Denison Rose, the plaintiff in the execution in the declaration mentioned, reversed the judgment of the court below, sustaine<^ the demurrer to the declaration, and gave judgment for the defendants.

Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman, 1 Va. 156, 1 Gratt. 157 (Va. 1844).

Pincite

1 Va. 156 (Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related