Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman

1 Va. 156, 1 Gratt. 157

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Va. 156 (Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Governor, for Leightons v. Hinchman, 1 Va. 156, 1 Gratt. 157 (Va. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The court

being of opinion, that upon the principle of the cases of Tolson v. Elwes, 1 Leigh 436, Meze v. Howver, Id. 442, and especially of the case of Burnett v. Harwell, 3 Leigh 89, the action was improperly [158]*158brought at the relation of Isaac and Daniel Leighton; ^ tkat-t ghoui¿ have been at the relation of Denison Rose, the plaintiff in the execution in the declaration mentioned, reversed the judgment of the court below, sustaine<^ the demurrer to the declaration, and gave judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court

being of opinion, that upon the principle of the cases of Tolson v. Elwes, 1 Leigh 436, Meze v. Howver, Id. 442, and especially of the case of Burnett v. Harwell, 3 Leigh 89, the action was improperly [158]*158brought at the relation of Isaac and Daniel Leighton; ^ tkat-t ghoui¿ have been at the relation of Denison Rose, the plaintiff in the execution in the declaration mentioned, reversed the judgment of the court below, sustaine<^ the demurrer to the declaration, and gave judgment for the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Va. 156, 1 Gratt. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/governor-for-leightons-v-hinchman-va-1844.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack