Governor ex rel. Smith & Bassett v. Kemp

12 Ga. 466
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1853·No. No. 77·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Warner, J.

delivering the opinion.'

[1.] The order from the minutes of the Court, ordering the defendant, Samuel Cherry, to be taken into the custody of the Sheriff, which was offered in evidence in the Court below, was improperly ruled out, and should have been admitted to the jury-

There is no evidence in the record, going to shew that Cherry was surrendered up by his securities on the ca. sa. bond in open Court, so as to require an exonereiur to have been entered on the minutes of the Court. The order of the Court was sufficiently full, in our judgment, to have authorized the Sheriff to have taken the defendant into custody, and to have detained him in the common jail of the County in obedience thereto. [469] Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed, on the ground that the Court erred in rejecting the order from the minutes of the Court, offered in evidence by the plaintiff, at the trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Governor ex rel. Smith & Bassett v. Kemp, 12 Ga. 466 (Ga. 1853).

12 Ga. 466 (Governor ex rel. Smith & Bassett v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Surety Co. v. State
179 S.E. 407 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Cooper v. Brown
73 S.E. 1101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Roberts v. Gordon
12 S.E. 648 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)