Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley

11 N.C. 20
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1825·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Ham,, Judge. —

I think the Judge decided rightly in not suffering the plaintiff to give evidence of the contents of the paper writing, beforo he had better accounted for the loss of it, when he had it amply in his power to do so, by calling Boon, the administrator of Wheeler, into whose possession they had traced it. Boon’s declarations' ought not to have been received, when there was no obstacle shown to procuring his testimony as a witness; of course the rule for obtaining a new trial should be discharged.

The other Judges concurring,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley, 11 N.C. 20 (N.C. 1825).

11 N.C. 20 (Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avery v. Stewart.
46 S.E. 519 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
McFarland v. . Patterson
4 N.C. 421 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)