Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley

11 N.C. 20
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 N.C. 20 (Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Governor Ex Rel. Allen v. Barkley, 11 N.C. 20 (N.C. 1825).

Opinion

Ham,, Judge. —

I think the Judge decided rightly in not suffering the plaintiff to give evidence of the contents of the paper writing, beforo he had better accounted for the loss of it, when he had it amply in his power to do so, by calling Boon, the administrator of Wheeler, into whose possession they had traced it. Boon’s declarations' ought not to have been received, when there was no obstacle shown to procuring his testimony as a witness; of course the rule for obtaining a new trial should be discharged.

The other Judges concurring,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Avery v. Stewart.
46 S.E. 519 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
McFarland v. . Patterson
4 N.C. 421 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 N.C. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/governor-ex-rel-allen-v-barkley-nc-1825.