Government of the Canal Zone v. Manuel Tobar T. (Tobar)

565 F.2d 1321, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13116
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1978·No. 77-5404·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Tobar pled guilty to the charge of burglary enhanced by the Canal Zone’s habitual criminal statute, Title 6 Canal Zone Code § 113. When pleading guilty, appellant was wrongly advised that the maximum allowable sentence was fifteen years when it is life imprisonment. Rule 11(c)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, mandates that a defendant pleading guilty be advised of the maximum sentence allowed by law.

Because the district court failed to comply with Rule 11 in accepting Tobar’s guilty plea, Tobar must be allowed to plead anew. Sierra v. Government of Canal Zone, 5 Cir. 1977, 546 F.2d 77; McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); see United States v. Journet, 2 Cir. 1976, 544 F.2d 633.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Government of the Canal Zone v. Manuel Tobar T. (Tobar), 565 F.2d 1321, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13116 (5th Cir. 1978).

565 F.2d 1321 (Government of the Canal Zone v. Manuel Tobar T. (Tobar)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Appleby v. Recht
583 S.E.2d 800 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Wyatt
518 F. Supp. 1110 (S.D. Texas, 1981)
United States v. Winston Eugene Dayton
604 F.2d 931 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Elizabeth Enid Gray
584 F.2d 96 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Robert M. Howard v. United States
580 F.2d 716 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Lee Jackson Keel v. United States
572 F.2d 1135 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
James L. Coody v. United States
570 F.2d 540 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)