Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Apple Physical Therapy & Acupuncture, PLLC 2026 NY Slip Op 30820(U) March 4, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152919/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1529192025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/16/2026 3:45:38 PM] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MATTHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice --------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO MOTION DATE 10/28/2025 GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNl1Y COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL1Y COMPANY, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001
Plaintiff,
- V -
APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC,BRUCE L FELDMAN M.D., PLLC,CITI EXPRESS PHARMACY AND MEDICAL SUPPLIES, LLC,DG ACUPUNCTURE, P.C.,EXAMPLE SUPPLY, INC.,FULTON COMPREHENSIVE CARE NP FAMILY HEALTH, P.C.,GLENMORE MEDICAL, P.C.,GOOD SAMARITAN DECISION + ORDER ON HOSPITAL, HEALTH RECOVERY ORTHO CORP, MOTION KOHLER INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MEDICINE, PLLC,MEDEX DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER, LLC,OCEAN RADIOLOGY, P.C.,PEOPLE'S CHOICE MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.,1WELVE STEPS CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.,WATER BAY REHAB P.T., P.C.,WILLIS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, JEAN ADAM, JOSUE ADAM
Defendant. -------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, 42 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT
Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs
motion for a default judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
On March 4, 2025, plaintiff, Government Employees Insurance Company,
Including Its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO
Indemnity Company, and GEICO Casualty Company ("GEICO"), commenced this action
for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims arising out of
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 1 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
1 of 5 [* 1] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
a motor vehicle collision that allegedly occurred on August 21, 2024, on the ground that
claimants defendants Jean Adam and Josue Adam each failed to appear for duly and
properly requested examinations under oath ("EUOs") on two separate occasions, which
constituted a violation of a condition precedent to coverage by the terms of the ix>licy
and under the no-fault regulations (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Summons and Complaint]).
Defendants Kohler Interventional Pain Medicine, PLLC ("Kohler"), Apple
Physical Therapy & Acupuncture, PLLC ("Apple"), Bruce L. Feldman M.D., PLLC
("Feldman"), and DG Acupuncture, P.C ("DG") filed answers, which plaintiff accepted
(NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 18, 21).
Defendant Health Recovery Ortho Corp. ("Health Recovery") filed an answer
with counterclaims on May 15, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 19), which plaintiff rejected as
untimely (NYSCEF Doc. No. 20).
On October 28, 2025, plaintiff moved for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR
3215 against all defendants except: the four whose answers it had accepted (Kohler,
Apple, Feldman, and DG), and the two claimants and defendant Example Supply, Inc.
("Example") (whom plaintiff had been unable to serve despite diligent efforts) (NYSCEF
Doc. Nos. 23-24).
Defendant Fulton Comprehensive Care NP Family Health, P.C. ("Fulton")
subsequentlyfiledan answer with counterclaims on November 17, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc.
No. 38), which plaintiff rejected as untimely (NYSCEF Doc. 39).
Defendants Health Recovery and Fulton jointly opJX>se the default motion, arguing,
under CPLR 3012(d), that they have a reasonable excuse for late service of their
answers, and that plaintiff would not be prejudiced by accepting them, although they
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 2 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
2 of 5 [* 2] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
have not actually cross-moved under that provision to compel acceptance (NYSCEF Doc.
No. 41). As to the reasonable excuse, Health Recovery and Fulton point to a New York
Law Journal article of November 29, 2023, titled: "Secretary of State Admits to Delays
in Mailing Documents Served on Corporate Defendants, Prejudicing Plaintiffs' Ability to
Obtain Default Judgments" (NYSCEF Doc. No. 42). They note that they were served
through the Secretary of State, but do not deny receipt of the summons and complaint,
or offer any basis to conclude that the reported conditions persist at that department.
Nevertheless, the Court may, in the interest of justice, and even sua sponte, deem
a late answer timely filed (see Morales v American United Transp., Inc., 214 AD3d 415
[1 st Dept 203]; New Media Holding Co. LLCv Kagalovsky, 97 AD3d 463 [1 st Dept
2012]). Here, there is no prejudice, particularly in light of plaintiff's acceptance of the
apparently late answers of Apple, Feldman, and DG, and the unavailability of default
judgment against timely answering Kohler, or the unserved claimants and Example.
Accordingly, the Court will deem the answers of Health Recovery and Fulton timely-filed
(see id.).
A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must
move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of
the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the
claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[t]; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480,481 [1 st
Dept 2023]).
To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate
"enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists"
(Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 3 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
3 of 5 [* 3] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at
70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some
firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531,535 [1 st Dept 1987]).
The "failure of a person eligible for no-fault benefits to appear for a properly
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Apple Physical Therapy & Acupuncture, PLLC 2026 NY Slip Op 30820(U) March 4, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152919/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1529192025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/16/2026 3:45:38 PM] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MATTHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice --------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO MOTION DATE 10/28/2025 GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNl1Y COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL1Y COMPANY, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001
Plaintiff,
- V -
APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC,BRUCE L FELDMAN M.D., PLLC,CITI EXPRESS PHARMACY AND MEDICAL SUPPLIES, LLC,DG ACUPUNCTURE, P.C.,EXAMPLE SUPPLY, INC.,FULTON COMPREHENSIVE CARE NP FAMILY HEALTH, P.C.,GLENMORE MEDICAL, P.C.,GOOD SAMARITAN DECISION + ORDER ON HOSPITAL, HEALTH RECOVERY ORTHO CORP, MOTION KOHLER INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MEDICINE, PLLC,MEDEX DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER, LLC,OCEAN RADIOLOGY, P.C.,PEOPLE'S CHOICE MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.,1WELVE STEPS CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.,WATER BAY REHAB P.T., P.C.,WILLIS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, JEAN ADAM, JOSUE ADAM
Defendant. -------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, 42 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT
Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs
motion for a default judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
On March 4, 2025, plaintiff, Government Employees Insurance Company,
Including Its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO
Indemnity Company, and GEICO Casualty Company ("GEICO"), commenced this action
for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims arising out of
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 1 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
1 of 5 [* 1] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
a motor vehicle collision that allegedly occurred on August 21, 2024, on the ground that
claimants defendants Jean Adam and Josue Adam each failed to appear for duly and
properly requested examinations under oath ("EUOs") on two separate occasions, which
constituted a violation of a condition precedent to coverage by the terms of the ix>licy
and under the no-fault regulations (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Summons and Complaint]).
Defendants Kohler Interventional Pain Medicine, PLLC ("Kohler"), Apple
Physical Therapy & Acupuncture, PLLC ("Apple"), Bruce L. Feldman M.D., PLLC
("Feldman"), and DG Acupuncture, P.C ("DG") filed answers, which plaintiff accepted
(NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 18, 21).
Defendant Health Recovery Ortho Corp. ("Health Recovery") filed an answer
with counterclaims on May 15, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 19), which plaintiff rejected as
untimely (NYSCEF Doc. No. 20).
On October 28, 2025, plaintiff moved for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR
3215 against all defendants except: the four whose answers it had accepted (Kohler,
Apple, Feldman, and DG), and the two claimants and defendant Example Supply, Inc.
("Example") (whom plaintiff had been unable to serve despite diligent efforts) (NYSCEF
Doc. Nos. 23-24).
Defendant Fulton Comprehensive Care NP Family Health, P.C. ("Fulton")
subsequentlyfiledan answer with counterclaims on November 17, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc.
No. 38), which plaintiff rejected as untimely (NYSCEF Doc. 39).
Defendants Health Recovery and Fulton jointly opJX>se the default motion, arguing,
under CPLR 3012(d), that they have a reasonable excuse for late service of their
answers, and that plaintiff would not be prejudiced by accepting them, although they
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 2 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
2 of 5 [* 2] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
have not actually cross-moved under that provision to compel acceptance (NYSCEF Doc.
No. 41). As to the reasonable excuse, Health Recovery and Fulton point to a New York
Law Journal article of November 29, 2023, titled: "Secretary of State Admits to Delays
in Mailing Documents Served on Corporate Defendants, Prejudicing Plaintiffs' Ability to
Obtain Default Judgments" (NYSCEF Doc. No. 42). They note that they were served
through the Secretary of State, but do not deny receipt of the summons and complaint,
or offer any basis to conclude that the reported conditions persist at that department.
Nevertheless, the Court may, in the interest of justice, and even sua sponte, deem
a late answer timely filed (see Morales v American United Transp., Inc., 214 AD3d 415
[1 st Dept 203]; New Media Holding Co. LLCv Kagalovsky, 97 AD3d 463 [1 st Dept
2012]). Here, there is no prejudice, particularly in light of plaintiff's acceptance of the
apparently late answers of Apple, Feldman, and DG, and the unavailability of default
judgment against timely answering Kohler, or the unserved claimants and Example.
Accordingly, the Court will deem the answers of Health Recovery and Fulton timely-filed
(see id.).
A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must
move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of
the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the
claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[t]; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480,481 [1 st
Dept 2023]).
To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate
"enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists"
(Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 3 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
3 of 5 [* 3] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at
70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some
firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531,535 [1 st Dept 1987]).
The "failure of a person eligible for no-fault benefits to appear for a properly
noticed Examination Under Oath (EUO) on two separate occasions constitutes a breach
of a condition precedent and will vitiate coverage. This coverage defense will apply to
any claims, and is not determined on a bill by bill basis" (PV Holding Corp. v AB
Quality Health Supply Corp., 189 AD3d 645, 646 [1 st Dept 2020] [internal quotes and
cites omitted]).
Here, plaintiff has demonstrated that it is entitled to a default judgment against
the served non-answering defendants by submitting, inter alia: the summons and
verified complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1); affidavits of service and additional service in
complaint with CPLR3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 4, 7-8, 11-16, 22); an affirmation of
a GEICO claims adjuster, attesting to files maintained in this case, including claims
received from or on behalf of the two claimants, GEICO's standard business and mailing
practices, and the reasons GEICO sought EUOs for both claimants (NYSCEF Doc. No.
25); an affirmation of a GEICO EUO coordinator, attesting to the timely mailing and
scheduling of at least two EUOs for each of the claimants, and both claimants' failure to
appear at any EUO (NYSCEF Doc. No. 26); the EUO notices and transcripts
memorializing non-appearance (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 31-32); a police accident report
(NYSCEF Doc. No. 29); no-fault claims forms (NYSCEF Doc. No. 30); and an attorney
affirmation in support of the motion (NYSCEF Doc. No. 24).
It is therefore
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 4 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
4 of 5 [* 4] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2026 03:44 P~ INDEX NO. 152919/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2026
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted as to
defendants Citi Express Pharmacy and Medical Supplies, LLC, Glenmore Medical, P.C.,
Good Samaritan Hospital, Medex Diagnostic and Treatment Center, LLC, Ocean
Radiology, P.C., People's Choice Medical Supplies, Inc., Twelve Steps Chiropractic, P.C.,
Water Bay Rehab P.T., P.C., and Willis Equipment Corporation; and it is further
ORDERED that the answers of defendants Health Recovery Ortho Corp. and
Fulton Comprehensive Care NP Family Health, P.C. are deemed timely filed; and it is
further
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment is denied as to defendants
Fulton Comprehensive Care NP Family Health, P.C.; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment declaring that plaintiff,
GEICO, has no duty to provide no-fault reimbursements to the defaulting defendants for
any claim or bill submitted by or on behalf of claimants Jean Adam and Josue Adam
arising out of the alleged incident of August 21, 2024, referenced by GEICO claim
number 8721497100000001.
3/4/2026 fi,{j DATE MATTHEW V. GRIECO, J.5.C.
~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
152919/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 5 of 5 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. APPLE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE, PLLC ET AL Motion No. 001
5 of 5 [* 5]