Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Abohussein PT, P.C.

2026 NY Slip Op 30693(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedFebruary 27, 2026
DocketIndex No. 150011/2025
StatusUnpublished
AuthorMatthew V. Grieco

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30693(U) (Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Abohussein PT, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Abohussein PT, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 30693(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Abohussein PT, P.C. 2026 NY Slip Op 30693(U) February 27, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150011/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1500112025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/10/2026 3:45:49 PM] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 10: 34 AM! INDEX NO. 150011/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MATTHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice ------------------------------ - - - - - X INDEX NO. 150011/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO MOTION DATE 01/29/2026 GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001

Plaintiff,

- V -

ABOHUSSEIN PT, P.C.,ALL CITY MEDICAL SERVICES, P.C.,ATLANTIC MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC, P.C.,BL PAIN MANAGEMENT, PLLC,DIANA BEYNIN, D.C., CPM MED SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A CITY DME, IMAGING CENTER OF ENGLEWOOD, LLC,NEW YORK SURGERY CENTER CORRECTED QUEENS, LLC,NORTHEAST MEDICAL DEVICES, LLC,NY DECISION + ORDER ON BALANCE ACUPUNCTURE, P.C.,PARKSIDE MEDICAL CARE, P.C.,RADCITI IMAGING, P.C.,RADIUS PT, MOTION P.C.,RIDGEWOOD DRUG, INC.,RYTE DRUGS CORP., SILVER STAR PHARMACY, INC. D/B/A MICHAELS PHARMACY, TITAN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES, INC.,W JOSEPH GORUM MD, P.C.,WALMED EQUIPMENT, LLC,MIGUEL DE LA CRUZ FERRERAS, DARIO DE LA CRUZ

Defendant. ------------------------------------------- ------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,42,43,44 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs motion for a

default judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

On December 31, 2024, plaintiff, Government Employees Insurance Company,

Including Its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO

Indemnity Company, and GEICO Casualty Company ("GEICO"), commenced this action

for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims arising out of

an alleged motor vehicle collision on August 23, 2023, on the ground that the claimants,

150011/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 1 of 4 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. ABOHUSSEIN PT, P.C. ET AL Motion No. 001

1 of 4 [* 1] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 10: 34 AM! INDEX NO. 150011/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2026

defendants Miguel A. De La Cruz Ferreras and Dario Stalin De La Cruz, failed to appear

for duly and properly requested examinations under oath ("EUOs"), which constituted a

violation of a condition precedent to coverage by the terms of the policy and under the

no-fault regulations (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Summons and Complaint]).

Defendant Northeast Medical Devices, LLC, filed an answer on March 4, 2025

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 22). Defendant Atlantic Medical & Diagnostic, P.C., filed an answer

on July 10, 2025 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 26). Although those answers were filed late (see

CPLR 3012), there is no prejudice, particularly in light of plaintiffs concession that

default judgment is unavailable as to the two claimants and another defendant, and the

Court will deem the answers timely filed nunc pro tune (see CPLR 2001).

Plaintiff moves for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 against all

defendants except Abohussein Mohamed Abohussein, P.T., Miguel A. De La Cruz

Ferreras, and Dario Stalin De La Cruz (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 28-30). Plaintiff states that it

was unable to serve those three defendants, despite diligent efforts; the Court notes that

Abohussein Mohamed Abohussein, P.T., is not actually named in the caption of the

summons or complaint, although he is in the body of the complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No.

1).

A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must

move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of

the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the

claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[f]; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480,481 [1 st

Dept 2023]).

150011/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 2 of 4 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUAL TY COMPANY vs. ABOHUSSEIN PT, P.C. ET AL Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 10: 34 AM! INDEX NO. 150011/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2026

To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate

"enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists"

(Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by

affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at i

70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some

firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531,535 [1st Dept 1987]).

"The failure of a person eligible for no-fault benefits to appear for a properly

noticed EUO constitutes a breach of a condition precedent vitiating coverage" (Mapfre

Ins. Co. of New York v Manoo, 140 AD3d 468,470 [1st Dept 2016]).

Here, plaintiff has demonstrated that it is entitled to a default judgment by

submitting, inter alia: the summons and verified complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1);

affidavits of service (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 2, 4-21, 23, 34, 39); copies of the Police

Accident Report (NYSCEF Doc. No. 35); an affirmation of GEICO claims adjuster Alison

Kolanovic, attesting to files maintained in this case, including claims received from or

on behalf of the two claimants, and to GEICO's standard business and mailing practices

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 31); an affirmation of GEICO EUO coordinator Ann Frances Ragone,

attesting to both claimants' non-appearance at timely scheduled and noticed EUOs, and

their failure to subscribe and return their EUO transcripts [memorializing their non-

appearance], despite multiple written requests (NYSCEF Doc. No. 32); claims forms

seeking no-fault benefits for Ferreras and De La Cruz (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 36 and 38);

copies of EUO appointment letters sent to Ferreras and De La Cruz, and transcripts of

their EU Os (NYSCEF Doc. No. 37); and an attorney affirmation in support of the motion

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 30).

150011/2025 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INCLUDING ITS Page 3 of 4 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY vs. ABOHUSSEIN PT, P.C. ET AL Motion No. 001

3 of 4 [* 3] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/2026 10: 34 AM! INDEX NO. 150011/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2026

It is therefore

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted as to

defendants Abohussein PT, P.C., All City Medical Services, P.C., BL Pain Management,

PLLC, Diana Beynin, D.C., CPM Med Supply, Inc. d/b/a City DME, Imaging Center of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.
790 N.E.2d 1156 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Mapfre Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Manoo
140 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Joosten v. Gale
129 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30693(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/government-empls-ins-co-v-abohussein-pt-pc-nysupctnewyork-2026.