Government Employees Insurance v. Wheelus ex rel. Wheelus

270 So. 2d 409
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1972·No. No. 71-184·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of a review of the briefs, the record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in dismissing appellant’s claim of lien without notice inasmuch as it clearly appears that the appellant was never a party to these proceedings. We further conclude that appellant’s notice of lien was a nullity of no force and effect. Blue Cross of Florida, Inc. v. O’Donnell, Fla.App. 1970, 230 So.2d 706.

Accordingly, the final order dismissing appellant’s notice of lien is affirmed, without prejudice to the appellant to pursue its subrogation rights as provided by law (see International Sales-Rentals Leasing Co., etc., et al. v. Nearhoof, Fla.1972, 263 So.2d 569); the final judgment of dismissal stands modified to such extent.

Affirmed, as modified.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Government Employees Insurance v. Wheelus ex rel. Wheelus, 270 So. 2d 409 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

270 So. 2d 409 (Government Employees Insurance v. Wheelus ex rel. Wheelus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Wheelus
382 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Rodriguez v. Travelers Ins. Co.
367 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)