Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola

Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola

82 A.D.3d 886, 918 N.Y.2d 365
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 886 (Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola, 82 A.D.3d 886, 918 N.Y.2d 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the time within which American Transit Insurance Company provided its insured with written notice disclaiming coverage was not unreasonable as a matter of law (see First Fin. Ins. Co. v Jetco Contr. Corp., 1 NY3d 64, 68-70 [2003]; Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Gray, 49 AD3d 1, 4 [2007]; Schoenig v North Sea Ins. Co., 28 AD3d 462 [2006]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Financial Insurance v. Jetco Contracting Corp.
801 N.E.2d 835 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Schoenig v. North Sea Insurance
28 A.D.3d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Gray
49 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 886, 918 N.Y.2d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/government-employees-insurance-v-vastola-nyappdiv-2011.