Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola
Opinion
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the time within which American Transit Insurance Company provided its insured with written notice disclaiming coverage was not unreasonable as a matter of law (see First Fin. Ins. Co. v Jetco Contr. Corp., 1 NY3d 64, 68-70 [2003]; Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Gray, 49 AD3d 1, 4 [2007]; Schoenig v North Sea Ins. Co., 28 AD3d 462 [2006]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
82 A.D.3d 886 (Government Employees Insurance v. Vastola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.