Government Employees Insurance v. Di Crisci

70 A.D.2d 628, 416 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12064
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1979·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In a declaratory judgment action, plaintiff and defendants Di Crisci and Tortorici cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 9, 1978, which, inter alia, failed to award counsel fees in this action to said defendants. Tortorici has apparently abandoned his appeal. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that defendant Di Crisci is entitled to counsel fees in this action. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and said action is remanded to Special Term for a hearing to determine the reasonable value of the counsel fees and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment. The determination at Special Term that counsel fees are not properly awarded to an insured for his defense of a declaratory judgment action brought by the insurer to determine coverage was error (see Hurney v Mattson, 59 AD2d 934; Penn Aluminum v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 61 AD2d 1119). Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Government Employees Insurance v. Di Crisci, 70 A.D.2d 628, 416 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

70 A.D.2d 628 (Government Employees Insurance v. Di Crisci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Mutual Insurance v. Willig
29 F. Supp. 3d 112 (N.D. New York, 2014)
U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Weatherization, Inc.
21 F. Supp. 2d 318 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Great Northern Insurance v. Dayco Corp.
637 F. Supp. 765 (S.D. New York, 1986)