Government Employees Insurance Company v. Tenenbaum
This text of Government Employees Insurance Company v. Tenenbaum (Government Employees Insurance Company v. Tenenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 22-CV-4543 (ARR) (PK)
Plaintiffs Opinion & Order
— against — Not for electronic or print publication LYNN CURCURO CONSULTING, LTD., et al.,
Defendants.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiffs
— against —
SUSAN J. POLINO PH.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), et al.,
ROSS, United States District Judge: I have received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated January 12, 2024, from the Honorable Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. I review “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, I need only satisfy myself “that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Est. of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imps. Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion for an order of prejudgment attachment against defendants
Gary Grody, Yuri Zayonts, and Irina Zayonts is granted. These defendants are ordered to disclose the identity of all property and debts owed in order to facilitate attachment. Within fourteen days of this order, plaintiffs are ordered to post an undertaking in the amount of $5,000 pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. 6212(b). See Yong Xiong He v. China New Star Rest., Inc., No. 19-CV-5907, 2020 WL 6202423, at *16 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2020) (collecting cases).
SO ORDERED.
_______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge
Dated: February 2, 2024 Brooklyn, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Tenenbaum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/government-employees-insurance-company-v-tenenbaum-nyed-2024.