Gouveia v. Kershaw
This text of 85 Misc. 2d 344 (Gouveia v. Kershaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[345]*345Memorandum. Final judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
The petition in this holdover summary proceeding, although not jurisdictionally defective, was insufficient on its face in that it did not contain an allegation as to whether the housing accommodations were subject to regulation pursuant to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 741, subd 4; Libe v Carles, NYLJ, Aug. 26, 1974, p 14, col 8, affd without opn 47 AD2d 815; Rosgro Realty Co. v Braynen, 70 Misc 2d 808).
Moreover, it was improper for the court below to render judgment without a trial.
Concur: Hogan, P. J., Pittoni and Farley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 Misc. 2d 344, 378 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gouveia-v-kershaw-nyappterm-1975.