Gourley v. State

787 So. 2d 975, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9003, 2001 WL 726019
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2001·No. No. 5D01-1447·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Based on defendant’s numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, Mr. Gourley is warned that filing any additional pro se petitions or appeals attacking his conviction and sentence in this case will result in the issuance of an order to show cause why he should not be denied further access to this court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gourley v. State, 787 So. 2d 975, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9003, 2001 WL 726019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 975 (Gourley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gourley v. State
820 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Irons v. State
787 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)