Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gourley v. State

Gourley v. State

608 So. 2d 886, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 1992 WL 312825
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 1992
DocketNo. 92-1828
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 886 (Gourley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gourley v. State, 608 So. 2d 886, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 1992 WL 312825 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Because of the number of such motions and other matters that appellant has filed attacking his conviction we, in all future matters the appellant files, will only require the trial court to review the pleadings to ascertain whether they present a facially sufficient claim indicating substantial merit. If appellant’s pleadings do not meet this standard, the trial court will be free to dismiss, without opinion, all such pleadings.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gourley v. State
787 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Smey v. Williams
608 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 886, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 1992 WL 312825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourley-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.