Gourley v. State
608 So. 2d 886, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 1992 WL 312825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 1992·No. No. 92-1828·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Because of the number of such motions and other matters that appellant has filed attacking his conviction we, in all future matters the appellant files, will only require the trial court to review the pleadings to ascertain whether they present a facially sufficient claim indicating substantial merit. If appellant’s pleadings do not meet this standard, the trial court will be free to dismiss, without opinion, all such pleadings.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gourley v. State, 608 So. 2d 886, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11307, 1992 WL 312825 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
608 So. 2d 886 (Gourley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gourley v. State
787 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Smey v. Williams
608 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)