Gourley v. Shoemaker

1 Johns. Cas. 392
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1800
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (Gourley v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gourley v. Shoemaker, 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient to- change the venue, to state merely that material witnesses reside in the county to which the party wishes to remove a cause; it ought to.be added, that evidence will be given of some material fact happening there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogert v. Hildreth
1 Cai. Cas. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourley-v-shoemaker-nysupct-1800.