Gourley v. Shoemaker
1 Johns. Cas. 392
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (Gourley v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gourley v. Shoemaker, 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
It is not sufficient to- change the venue, to state merely that material witnesses reside in the county to which the party wishes to remove a cause; it ought to.be added, that evidence will be given of some material fact happening there.
Rule refused.
See supra, 240, n. (a) to Bentley v. Weaver.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bogert v. Hildreth
1 Cai. Cas. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourley-v-shoemaker-nysupct-1800.