Gourley v. Shoemaker

1 Johns. Cas. 392
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient to- change the venue, to state merely that material witnesses reside in the county to which the party wishes to remove a cause; it ought to.be added, that evidence will be given of some material fact happening there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gourley v. Shoemaker, 1 Johns. Cas. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Johns. Cas. 392 (Gourley v. Shoemaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogert v. Hildreth
1 Cai. Cas. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)