Gourdine v. Theus

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Gourdine v. Theus

3 S.C.L. 326

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

The court were all of opinion, that a joint right cannot be barredby the limitation act, tf any of the persons connected in the right, are entitled to the benefit of any ol the exceptions in the saving clause of the act; and therefore a new trial was ordered.

Pringle, Utornev General, Desaussure, Bailey, and Gail-Lard, for plaintiff. Parker, and Simons, for defendant. Present, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard. Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court were all of opinion, that a joint right cannot be barredby the limitation act, tf any of the persons connected in the right, are entitled to the benefit of any ol the exceptions in the saving clause of the act; and therefore a new trial was ordered.

Pringle, Utornev General, Desaussure, Bailey, and Gail-Lard, for plaintiff. Parker, and Simons, for defendant. Present, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard. Justices.

Gourdine v. Theus, 3 S.C.L. 326 (S.C. 1804).

Pincite

3 S.C.L. 326 (Gourdine v. Theus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.