Gourdine v. Theus

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Gourdine v. Theus

3 S.C.L. 326

DecidedJanuary 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 326 (Gourdine v. Theus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gourdine v. Theus, 3 S.C.L. 326 (S.C. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

The court were all of opinion, that a joint right cannot be barredby the limitation act, tf any of the persons connected in the right, are entitled to the benefit of any ol the exceptions in the saving clause of the act; and therefore a new trial was ordered.

Pringle, Utornev General, Desaussure, Bailey, and Gail-Lard, for plaintiff. Parker, and Simons, for defendant. Present, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard. Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court were all of opinion, that a joint right cannot be barredby the limitation act, tf any of the persons connected in the right, are entitled to the benefit of any ol the exceptions in the saving clause of the act; and therefore a new trial was ordered.

Pringle, Utornev General, Desaussure, Bailey, and Gail-Lard, for plaintiff. Parker, and Simons, for defendant. Present, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard. Justices.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourdine-v-theus-sc-1804.