Gourdine v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
This text of 351 S.E.2d 163 (Gourdine v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[431]*431Appellant (Gourdine) commenced this action against respondent (Highway Department) to recover for injuries allegedly sustained on March 30, 1985, from a defect in the highway. The Highway Department. moved to strike from the complaint allegations of actual damages exceeding the limits set out in S. C. Code Ann. § 57-5-1810 (1976).1 The trial judge granted the motion to strike. We reverse.
In a suit against the State in which the cause of action arose prior to July 1,1986, the plaintiffs recovery is limited only by the amount of liability insurance. Moore v. Berkeley County, 290 S. C. 43, 348 S. E. (2d) 174 (1986). The trial judge therefore erred in granting the motion to strike.
Accordingly, the order of the trial judge is reversed and the case is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
351 S.E.2d 163, 290 S.C. 430, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourdine-v-south-carolina-department-of-highways-public-transportation-sc-1986.