Gourdain v. Baylies
This text of 10 La. Ann. 691 (Gourdain v. Baylies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We concur with the District Judge in the opinion that the evidence offered by the plaintiffs rendered the sincerity of the sale from Baylies to Nash so improbable, that a prima facie case of simulation was made out; the failure of the defendant, Nash, to rebut the case thus made, by competent evidence that he had actually paid anything for the slaves he pretended to purchase, justified the court a quo, under the pleadings, in subjecting the slaves in question to be seized and sold to satisfy the plaintiffs’ demand. See Birdsdale v. Lakey, 6 An., 647.
The judgment Is therefore affirmed, with costs,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 La. Ann. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gourdain-v-baylies-la-1855.