Goumas v. K. Karras & Son
140 F.2d 157, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3893, 1944 A.M.C. 60
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 1944
DocketNo. 221
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases
This text of 140 F.2d 157 (Goumas v. K. Karras & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goumas v. K. Karras & Son, 140 F.2d 157, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3893, 1944 A.M.C. 60 (2d Cir. 1944).
Opinion
We agree with what was said in the excellent opinion of the court below as, to the lack of admiralty jurisdiction here. There is no jurisdiction in admiralty except of a maritime contract, and the contract here was not of that character.1 The same considerations apply if the libel be regarded as stating a tort claim: It is not a maritime tort.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Garanti Finansal Kiralama A.S. v. Aqua Marine and Trading Inc.
697 F.3d 59 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.
739 F.2d 798 (Second Circuit, 1984)
Brown v. Motor Vessel "Numero Uno"
20 V.I. 368 (Virgin Islands, 1983)
Bergen Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Japan Marine Serv., Ltd.
386 F. Supp. 430 (S.D. New York, 1974)
T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Rigby
305 F. Supp. 418 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)
P. D. Marchessini & Co., (NEW YORK) Inc. v. Pacific Marine Corp.
227 F. Supp. 17 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Miravalles Compania Naviera, S. S. v. Nissho Co., Ltd., Tokyo
207 F. Supp. 716 (E.D. New York, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 F.2d 157, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3893, 1944 A.M.C. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goumas-v-k-karras-son-ca2-1944.