Goulet v. Goulet

97 A.D.2d 940, 468 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20736
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term did not abuse its discretion in ordering an increase in child support based on the children’s right to receive adequate support (see Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132; see, also, Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924) and in awarding alimony (Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part A). The stipulation of the parties at the time of their divorce, which provided a temporary waiver of alimony, is not a bar to plaintiff’s present application. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — modify divorce decree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goulet v. Goulet, 97 A.D.2d 940, 468 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

97 A.D.2d 940 (Goulet v. Goulet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Batson
277 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)